Old Black Neil Young Replica
There are lots of stories about it, but nobody knows exactly why. We can only speculate on the reasons based on historical facts. It´s supposed that the guitar suffered an accident. This assumption is based on two details. One is the maple band that stretches all along the body and neck, the other is the Crown inlay in the headstock.
As you all know, the Les Paul model went through big changes in 1961 because of the low sales volumes of the model, and Gibson decided to re-design it. Les Paul himself opposed to this model (SG), saying “it wasn´t his guitar”. Even though there were some runs of the guitar (SG) with the Les Paul signature stamped on them, Gibson gave in and started to use the “crown” inlay on the headstock. Below you can see a picture of an original headstock from around that time. They also experimented with different scrolls and combined mahogany and maple necks trying to solve the common neck breaks.
Hence those circumstances the theory that the guitar must´ve suffered an accident around those dates and the neck was replaced. This fact is more credible as most repaired guitars from that time show the Crown inlay headstock. That´s why Old Black has the Crown inlay instead of the Les Paul signature, apart from another important detail that I will comment on at a later stage.
The milling is quite difficult, as you can see, as it´s not the same to work on “virgin” wood and give it the shape needed than working with an already crafted instrument where the luthier has to adapt to the irregular shapes already in the guitar.
The channeling from the bottom until
the headstock
Preparing the hard maple strip for
giving it shape thermally.
Checking that everything fits correctly
readjusting the levels
and glueing it, beginning from the bottom area
then all along the neck
Once the maple strip is matched and glued to the curved surface of the neck, it looks like a composite neck.
Detail of the back of the neck.
A couple views of the body´s back
and also the front
A 1/16” sheet is on the surface of the headstock. It will need to be removed as it´s impossible to make the relic effect as it is. Acrylics don´t tear nor break in the same way as wood, hence making it very difficult to manage the same relic effect, unless using some kind of pigment.
Previous page Next page
There are lots of stories about it, but nobody knows exactly why. We can only speculate on the reasons based on historical facts. It´s supposed that the guitar suffered an accident. This assumption is based on two details. One is the maple band that stretches all along the body and neck, the other is the Crown inlay in the headstock.
As you all know, the Les Paul model went through big changes in 1961 because of the low sales volumes of the model, and Gibson decided to re-design it. Les Paul himself opposed to this model (SG), saying “it wasn´t his guitar”. Even though there were some runs of the guitar (SG) with the Les Paul signature stamped on them, Gibson gave in and started to use the “crown” inlay on the headstock. Below you can see a picture of an original headstock from around that time. They also experimented with different scrolls and combined mahogany and maple necks trying to solve the common neck breaks.
Hence those circumstances the theory that the guitar must´ve suffered an accident around those dates and the neck was replaced. This fact is more credible as most repaired guitars from that time show the Crown inlay headstock. That´s why Old Black has the Crown inlay instead of the Les Paul signature, apart from another important detail that I will comment on at a later stage.
Back to the neck work, some luthiers and
manufacturers of Old Black replicas, have chosen to paint the stripe
located at the back, which is a lot easier and not all have the
equipment/ability to recreate it using an already built guitar (it´d be
easier if starting from scratch). In this project, the owner and myself
want the replica to be as close to the original as possible, hence the
extra work.
The solution is to create a maple stripe inlaid
in the guitar, for which firstly the routing has to be done. To do this
I had to design and make special tools for the job.
Once done you can see channeling through the
body and neck is not very deep, ensuring not to reach the truss rod, but
enough to strengthen the body and neck and look good on the aesthetic
side of things.
The milling is quite difficult, as you can see, as it´s not the same to work on “virgin” wood and give it the shape needed than working with an already crafted instrument where the luthier has to adapt to the irregular shapes already in the guitar.
The channeling from the bottom until
the headstock
Preparing the hard maple strip for
giving it shape thermally.
Checking that everything fits correctly
readjusting the levels
and glueing it, beginning from the bottom area
then all along the neck
Once the maple strip is matched and glued to the curved surface of the neck, it looks like a composite neck.
Detail of the back of the neck.
Interestingly, the “channeling” does not have
maple all along its surface. There´s an area where not only the shape
it´s irregular, but if you look closely at the first pics, you´ll notice
it´s empty. Another mystery to clarify…
After the previous work had been done, I started
to work on the famous “mystery” back plate, which remains unknown as to
why it´s there. Nobody knows what´s underneath. Lots of speculation on
the possibility that the body of the guitar also suffered an accident
and the plate is there as a structural reinforcement, another says it´s
just some access to adjust the bridge (not a real option as it´s in a
different position, in any case it does match the Bigsby position on the
front of the body). In my opinion the explanation is not as complex as
the stories circulating around: possibly when they tried to add the
mini-switch currently located between the volume and tone knobs and
realized that it was in the wrong position, they had to move it to the
right place and therefore the cavity had to be covered. In our case,
we´re only interested in the aesthetics and it´s more than enough to
just mill it slightly in order to fit the plate (same as the pickup
selector cover).
A couple views of the body´s back
and also the front
Another noticeable modification is in the
headstock. It´s not known whether the binding was removed or if the
intention was to add it. In any case, the space for it is there and will
also be done in our guitar.
Nevertheless here´s one of the things that
really surprises me from a well renowned company. One would expect to
find wood, but in this occasion what I found was an acrylic sheet. I
sanded the Gibson logo and it wouldn’t go away, and I thought it was
some really deep serigraphy work that would disappear as I kept sanding
like in other guitars, but soon I realized it´s golden acrylic lettering.
It´s a great idea but not for a musical instrument. Breaks in this type
of material are much more difficult to repair as when it cracks it “explodes”.
A 1/16” sheet is on the surface of the headstock. It will need to be removed as it´s impossible to make the relic effect as it is. Acrylics don´t tear nor break in the same way as wood, hence making it very difficult to manage the same relic effect, unless using some kind of pigment.
Previous page Next page